From: David Schwartz <davids@webmaster.com>
Subject: Re: Linux or FreeBSD a better choice for threads/tasking?
Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2001 11:41:19 -0700
Date: 2001-04-03T18:41:22+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3ACA194F.14F2D76F@webmaster.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3ACA15AC.31C02720@bga.com
"Arthur H. Gold" wrote:
> No argument there; the only problem is that in this respect
> linuxthreads contravenes the POSIX standard for threads,
> resulting in portability problems.
It's not that terribly difficult to avoid using signals in a
multithreaded program. This is one of the many cases where the standard
is lacking. 'set[re]uid' is another.
DS
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-04-03 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-03-30 2:36 Linux or FreeBSD a better choice for threads/tasking? Mike Silva
2001-03-30 7:14 ` Christopher Green
2001-03-30 9:55 ` Hans-Olof Danielsson
2001-03-30 12:28 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
2001-03-30 20:35 ` Stefan Skoglund
2001-04-01 7:03 ` Arthur H. Gold
2001-04-01 16:53 ` Patrick TJ McPhee
2001-04-03 12:08 ` Florian Weimer
2001-04-03 18:25 ` Arthur H. Gold
2001-04-03 18:41 ` David Schwartz [this message]
2001-04-03 19:41 ` Florian Weimer
2001-04-04 7:28 ` igor
2001-04-04 3:22 ` Patrick TJ McPhee
2001-04-01 19:41 ` David Schwartz
2001-04-01 19:57 ` Dima Volodin
2001-04-02 1:26 ` David Schwartz
2001-04-02 17:39 ` Dima Volodin
2001-04-03 11:36 ` Matthias Kretschmer
2001-04-03 11:40 ` Matthias Kretschmer
2001-04-02 16:17 ` Sander Pilon
[not found] ` <3AC8B9DD.134B6562@dvv.org>
2001-04-02 19:21 ` Marin David Condic
[not found] ` <3AC8DDA0.D4DF412B@dvv.org>
2001-04-03 20:48 ` Dima Volodin
[not found] ` <x7v66gn2gfy.fsf@smaug.pushface.org>
2001-04-03 20:55 ` Dima Volodin
2001-04-10 6:32 ` Simon Wright
2001-04-02 21:41 ` Sander Pilon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox