From: Jeffrey Carter <jrcarter@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?)
Date: Fri, 02 Feb 2001 04:41:10 GMT
Date: 2001-02-02T04:41:10+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A7A2C91.9293E7E2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 95dama$1gk$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
> This is a misconception, no one could say at this stage when
> the next revision of the Ada standard might be, but in any case
> well conceived proposals can be considered as amendment AI's
> by the ARG right now, without waiting for a new revision to be
> in view. I will not comment on whether I consider this
> particular proposal to be well conceived, I will leave that
> to others.
Come, now, there are few people better qualified to make such comments
than Robert Dewar.
Nick Roberts' proposal is essentially the same as mine. I don't consider
it a big deal one way or the other. I don't agree with removing the
ordering constraint on enumerated types.
--
Jeff Carter
"English bed-wetting types."
Monty Python & the Holy Grail
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-02-02 4:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 38+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-20 7:26 Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-20 14:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Jeff Creem
2001-01-20 16:23 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-20 19:18 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 22:27 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-21 16:06 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 23:08 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 2:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 16:02 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 16:50 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 21:12 ` Brian Rogoff
2001-01-22 21:26 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
[not found] ` <Pine.BSF.4.21.0101230839000.15065-100000@shell5.ba.best.com>
[not found] ` <94rbdo$vf$1@wanadoo.fr>
2001-01-26 16:41 ` LOF4 (Was Re: Extensible Enummerated types) Brian Rogoff
2001-01-20 22:34 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 16:09 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 19:04 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 19:26 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 21:12 ` Mark Carroll
2001-01-21 17:47 ` Nick Roberts
2001-01-21 19:37 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 17:26 ` Mark Lundquist
2001-01-22 20:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2001-01-22 21:41 ` Matthew Woodcraft
2001-01-30 16:17 ` Tucker Taft
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Extensible Enumerated " Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-10 20:34 ` Vincent Marciante
2001-01-31 8:05 ` Supertypes RE: Extensible Enumerated types Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-01-31 15:15 ` Marin David Condic
2001-02-01 22:03 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Nick Roberts
2001-02-02 3:48 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 4:41 ` Jeffrey Carter [this message]
2001-02-02 7:26 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 16:38 ` Robert Dewar
2001-02-02 20:39 ` (Private message. Sorry) Nick Roberts
2001-01-22 15:02 ` Extensible Enummerated types FW: When will next Ada revision be? (83, 95, ?) Ted Dennison
2001-01-28 8:10 ` Robert C. Leif, Ph.D.
2001-02-02 21:54 ` Nick Roberts
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox