From: Larry Hazel <lhazel@mindspring.com>
Subject: Re: Ada 95 grammar for aflex?
Date: Sat, 20 Jan 2001 22:46:25 -0600
Date: 2001-01-21T04:43:57+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A6A69A1.6A38AAC7@mindspring.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 94comf$vf7$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
> If you are not interested in error recovery, there is
> absolutely no difficulty in writing a table driven parser
> for C++. The problem with g++ is that it has grown rusty
> with all kinds of kludges, and no one has had the nerve
> to redo it from scratch which is what was needed :-)
>
So Robert, are you going to write a new parser for g++ in Ada and show them up?
Larry
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-01-21 4:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-01-18 14:54 Ada 95 grammar for aflex? Ralf Reißing
2001-01-18 15:07 ` Frode Tenneboe
2001-01-18 15:37 ` Ted Dennison
2001-01-19 11:15 ` Mario Amado Alves
2001-01-19 16:36 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-19 18:29 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-20 14:30 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-20 16:19 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-20 19:25 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 1:55 ` Cesar Rabak
2001-01-21 16:01 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-22 15:58 ` Ira D. Baxter
2001-01-22 17:32 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 4:46 ` Larry Hazel [this message]
2001-01-21 16:02 ` Robert Dewar
2001-01-21 17:30 ` Larry Hazel
2001-01-21 22:42 ` Larry Kilgallen
2001-01-23 4:16 ` Warren W. Gay VE3WWG
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox