From: Ted Dennison <dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: Task stack overflow problem with GNAT
Date: 2000/10/09
Date: 2000-10-09T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A094BF4.C737809F@telepath.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8rrtmc$fcc$1@nnrp1.deja.com
fabien_bousquet@my-deja.com wrote:
> My code is supposed to be embedded and I do not use dynamic allocation.
Do you mean you don't have a heap and access to the "new" operator at all,
or do you mean you do, but you aren't supposed to use them?
There should be no problem in performing dynamic allocation in an embedded
system, as long as you do it once at startup rather than repetedly at
runtime.
--
T.E.D.
Home - mailto:dennison@telepath.com Work - mailto:dennison@ssd.fsi.com
WWW - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html ICQ - 10545591
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-06 0:00 Task stack overflow problem with GNAT fabien_bousquet
2000-10-06 0:00 ` Marc A. Criley
2000-10-09 0:00 ` fabien_bousquet
2000-10-09 0:00 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2000-10-09 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
2000-10-09 0:00 ` Steven Deller
2000-10-10 0:00 ` fabien_bousquet
2000-10-09 0:00 ` fabien_bousquet
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox