From: Mats Weber <matsw@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Redefined "=" = generic disaster?
Date: Thu, 02 Nov 2000 17:52:51 +0100
Date: 2000-11-02T17:52:51+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3A019BDD.E9A7E94A@mail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3A00FB44.C59@li.net
Vincent Marciante wrote:
> Also, I remembered the previous thread and tried to
> reread it on deja before I posted my note. That
> previous thread didn't single out reemergence of "="
> as being especially bad though - did it?
Yes, one of them at least did. But I think it is in the period that is
currently not searchable with deja.com.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-11-02 16:52 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-21 6:59 Redefined "=" = generic disaster? Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-22 2:50 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-22 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-28 11:12 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-29 8:43 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-30 3:49 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-30 18:46 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-31 3:27 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 6:54 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-31 19:51 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-01 17:47 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 5:27 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-11-02 16:52 ` Mats Weber [this message]
2000-11-02 14:59 ` Tucker Taft
2000-11-05 4:29 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:32 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:26 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox