From: Vincent Marciante <marciant@li.net>
Subject: Re: Redefined "=" = generic disaster?
Date: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 03:43:27 -0500
Date: 2000-10-29T03:43:27-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <39FBE32F.63CF@li.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8tecab$epm$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> In article <39F1F686.26B5@li.net>,
> Vincent Marciante <marciant@li.net> wrote:
> > I still think that this all opens up the possibility of more
> > unexpected results in Ada 95 than it did in Ada 83.
>
> I don't see it. Of course anything can be unexpected to anyone
> depending on what they know and what they expect :-)
>
> Please post exact Ada 95 code that works (check it out first)
> and does something you consider unexpected.
Okay, but no time right now - I will soon.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-10-29 8:43 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-10-21 6:59 Redefined "=" = generic disaster? Vincent Marciante
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-28 11:12 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-29 8:43 ` Vincent Marciante [this message]
2000-10-30 3:49 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-30 18:46 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-31 3:27 ` Lao Xiao Hai
2000-10-31 6:54 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-31 19:51 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-01 17:47 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 5:27 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-11-02 16:52 ` Mats Weber
2000-11-02 14:59 ` Tucker Taft
2000-11-05 4:29 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:32 ` Robert Dewar
2000-11-05 4:26 ` Robert Dewar
2000-10-21 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-10-22 2:50 ` Jeff Carter
2000-10-22 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox