Re: disjoint ranges ?

[Philippe Torres <ptorres@laas.fr>]

Jeff Carter wrote:
> 
> It's interesting how the useful things you can do easily with types and
> subtypes in Ada, and not at all or with difficulty in many (most?) other
> languages, lead people to expect even more from Ada's type system than
> it should reasonably be expected to do.
> 
It's very true but i find that, range being an attribute so common, the
union of ranges would be very useful and not that unreasonable. it could
only improve Ada's advantage in this domain. Perhaps in some future ?

Philippe