Re: Get_Line vs Adasockets

[Martin Dowie <martin.dowie@baesystems.com>]

Yeah, I thought that too for a minute, but on closer inspection, the code is a
procedure with a nested function (instance of unchecked_conversion)  and not a
package with a function being defined in it - so no 'return' statement required
(although allowed ;-).

Perhaps one of the language lawyers could comment on the use of
unchecked_conversion to (I assume) convert from an address to an access type? I
thought that was the purpose of the standard package
System.Address_To_Access_Conversions?

Dale Stanbrough wrote:
> 
> 
> ...and i can't see a return statement in your function.
> 
> Dale

-- 
The views expressed here are personal and not those of BAE Systems.