From: Geoff Bull <geoff@research.canon.com.au>
Subject: Re: return statements in procedures
Date: 2000/06/05
Date: 2000-06-05T06:23:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <393B478D.642D9C31@research.canon.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 393B2054.618F6E80@baesystems.com.au
Matthew Daniel wrote:
>
> There is one who believes it is acceptable for certain circumstances and
> the rest of us do not believe it should occur.
>
> just seeing what every one else thinks.
Given appropriate circumstances, anything is acceptable.
If return statements in procedures were never acceptable,
the language designers would have made them illegal.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-06-05 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-06-05 0:00 return statements in procedures Matthew Daniel
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-06-05 0:00 ` r_c_chapman
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Geoff Bull [this message]
2000-06-06 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-06-05 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-06-06 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
2000-06-06 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox