From: Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Re: BLAS
Date: 2000/05/12
Date: 2000-05-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <391BC487.3737DF16@maths.unine.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: E12q9ou-00008c-00@Baldrick
> How important do you think it is to keep Ada 83 compatibility?
[Short version:] not important!
More important would be to add to Ada83 still in activity
(DEC Ada: latest update 4/1999 or later) some name syntax for
Ada95 packages.
For DEC Ada:
"Ada.Numerics.Generic_Elementary_functions" would alias "Math_Lib"
and so on;
Interfaces would be added (some contents are already in System!)
as well as Interfaces.Fortran.
Would be a Ada 83.5, but very useful.
Another thing to do: compare compilers, Ada and Fortran,
on many platforms, to have an idea of the numerics-friendly
optimisations.
_____________________________________________
Gautier -- http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-05-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-05-12 0:00 BLAS Duncan Sands
2000-05-12 0:00 ` Gautier [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2000-05-15 0:00 BLAS Duncan Sands
2000-05-15 0:00 ` BLAS Robert A Duff
2000-05-15 0:00 ` BLAS Robert Dewar
2000-05-16 0:00 ` BLAS Robert A Duff
2000-05-17 0:00 ` BLAS Robert Dewar
2000-05-17 0:00 ` BLAS Robert A Duff
2000-05-18 0:00 ` BLAS Robert Dewar
[not found] <391BC1F5.DFB47045@maths.unine.ch>
2000-05-12 0:00 ` BLAS Duncan Sands
2000-05-12 0:00 ` BLAS Gautier
2000-05-12 0:00 ` BLAS Robert A Duff
2000-05-13 0:00 ` BLAS Larry Kilgallen
2000-05-14 0:00 ` BLAS Gautier
2000-05-15 0:00 ` BLAS Larry Kilgallen
2000-05-15 0:00 ` BLAS Gisle S�lensminde
2000-05-15 0:00 ` BLAS Gisle S�lensminde
2000-05-13 0:00 ` BLAS Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox