Re: Ada grammar

["Samuel T. Harris" <samuel_t_harris@Raytheon.com>]

Robert Dewar wrote:
> 
> In article <004d942d.2e326cd2@usw-ex0104-026.remarq.com>,
>   bradders <bradNObrSPAM@england.com.invalid> wrote:
> > My company produces a UML based Real-time modelling tool. We
> > generate and reverse engineer code for C, C++ and Java and
> soon
> > we will be supporting Ada 95. Basically I need to be able to
> > Parse Ada code to build up a symbol table and populate a class
> > model.
> 
> It seems like you would do much better to use ASIS for this
> purpose, no?
> 
> Sent via Deja.com http://www.deja.com/
> Before you buy.

I believe when "bradders" considers the complexity
introduced by package rename declarations, he will
quickly deduce that the effort needed to write code
to support the semantic information required to
determine equivalent references to the same object
through various renamed objects will be vastly greater
than the learning curve for ASIS which already
performs this feat, as well as many others,
automagically.

-- 
Samuel T. Harris, Principal Engineer
Raytheon, Aerospace Engineering Services
"If you can make it, We can fake it!"