From: Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Re: Export instances of procedures
Date: 2000/04/20
Date: 2000-04-20T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38FED802.9952EC51@maths.unine.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8dkt67$pp1$1@wanadoo.fr
Pascal Obry:
> You are right but my point was that this was not possible with the *supplied
> code*
> sample. But as you point it is always possible to have this working but here
> the Program_DMA generic unit must be moved to the spec (or another spec
> package). But here you have a side effect. The generic unit is now visible
> to
> users ! Maybe there is a nice way to handle that with some child
> libraries...
You guessed well that the generic "Program_DMA" is rather of internal use!
Anyway in this context putting it into the spec. is not too dramatic : the full
DMA package (spec. & body) has now found its place inside another one.
The simple solution of putting the generic in the spec. had just not hit me...
Thank you (J.-P.) for the idea and debate!
The case appears in other pieces of code :-)
_____________________________________________
Gautier -- http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-20 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-18 0:00 Export instances of procedures Gautier
2000-04-18 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-04-25 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-04-25 0:00 ` Vincent Marciante
2000-04-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-26 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-04-26 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-04-19 0:00 ` Pascal Obry
2000-04-20 0:00 ` Gautier [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox