From: "Marin D. Condic" <mcondic-nospam@quadruscorp.com>
Subject: Re: Ada Core Technologies announces GNATCOM
Date: 2000/04/09
Date: 2000-04-09T14:50:46+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38F0C28C.A9A80FCF@quadruscorp.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2000Apr9.073658.1@eisner
Larry Kilgallen wrote:
>
> I try to keep up with this newsgroup, and I have not heard anything
> about any current official venue for creating a next generation of
> the standard.
>
Is there some planned ISO committee or some such to start taking
revision suggestions to the language? If Ada holds to the original model
of a new standard every 10 or so years, I'd think now would be the time
to start discussions.
Actually, I don't think Ada95 needs a whole lot of revision. The new
language plugged most, if not all, of the flaws in Ada83 and I don't see
any major new programming theories that need language support in which
you can't get there from here. Aside from maybe filing down a few burrs
here and there, I think what Ada05 needs is merely some additional
annexes that spell out more optional libraries. (Data structures? Math
libraries? Bindings to specific platforms? I really like the model that
exists now for annexes: "You don't have to do this if you don't want to,
but if you *do* support this feature, it must conform to the
following....")
Anybody heard of any activity from the group working on Ada libraries?
MDC
--
======================================================================
Marin David Condic - Quadrus Corporation - http://www.quadruscorp.com/
Send Replies To: m c o n d i c @ q u a d r u s c o r p . c o m
Visit my web site at: http://www.mcondic.com/
"I'd trade it all for just a little more"
-- Charles Montgomery Burns, [4F10]
======================================================================
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-09 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 47+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-04-07 0:00 Ada Core Technologies announces GNATCOM Robert Dewar
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-04-07 0:00 ` Vladimir Olensky
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-08 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-04-08 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic [this message]
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-04-09 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Gisle S�lensminde
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-04-10 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-04-09 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-11 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-04-09 0:00 ` tmoran
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2000-04-12 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-04-12 0:00 ` David Botton
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-14 0:00 ` Geoff Bull
2000-04-14 0:00 ` dale
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` DuckE
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-13 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-04-12 0:00 ` C_Pass_By_Value, was " tmoran
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Tom Hargraves
2000-04-08 0:00 ` David
2000-04-08 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-04-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox