From: Mats Weber <matsw@mail.com>
Subject: Re: Dynamic run-time
Date: 2000/04/04
Date: 2000-04-04T16:22:30+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38EA16C5.22EC8332@mail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38E3BAC4.FC400CA4@averstar.com
Tucker Taft wrote:
> Not really. Using tagged types you can do the kind of dynamic binding
> that exists in C++ or Eiffel, but not the kind of "very dynamic" binding
> that you can do in SmallTalk. The upside is that in Ada you will
> never get a "message not understood." [...]
Well, you can get Constraint_Error instead of "message not understood",
see Ada RM 3.9.2(16).
prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-04-04 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-30 0:00 Dynamic run-time xaplos
2000-03-30 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-04-03 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-04-04 0:00 ` Mats Weber [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox