Re: What is wrong here? (Generic and controlled types)

[Alexander Boucke <alexb@lufmech.rwth-aachen.de>]

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> The good news is that since this was just a test program, there's a
> decent chance you will never again need to instantiate a your generic in
> a procedure. If that's the case, just declare a package spec to be the
> instantiation of your generic, and you can go on your merry way.
> 

You are right, the future use will be inside of other packages... And it
works nicely, I just followed your advice to put the instantiation in a
package spec.

Thanks,

Alexander Boucke

-- 
"I try to write idiot proof code, but they keep making better idiots."

A. Stanley in comp.sys.sgi.admin