Re: Question regarding package

["Marin D. Condic" <mcondic-nospam@quadruscorp.com>]

joe Tsai wrote:
> for example if I wrote generic package call Gen_List.  I can use it with the
> following ways,
> 
> package Stuff is newGen_List(Integer);
> use Stuff;
> 
> the question is that if I can assign a package as type?
> 
> type thing is
>   .....
> 
Your question is not 100% clear - maybe you should explain a little more
about what you want to accomplish & we can help point the way.

In general, the answer to your question is "no". A package is a
conglomeration of types, objects, subprograms and tasks. Making it
generic does not really change this. A type is a definition of how to
interpret raw memory. (O.K. not *strictly* accurate, but good enough for
this purpose.) How could a type contain actual memory for objects?
Declaring new objects of that type starts getting you into a paradox of
sorts.

You might think of a generic package instantiation as a kind of object
declaration. The generic package is similar to a type and the instance
is similar to an object - a specific occurence of the general
definition. 

If you had something else in mind, post more detail and I'm sure someone
will be glad to point out that I don't know what I'm talking about. :-)

MDC
-- 
=============================================================
Marin David Condic   - Quadrus Corporation -   1.800.555.3393
1015-116 Atlantic Boulevard, Atlantic Beach, FL 32233
http://www.quadruscorp.com/
m c o n d i c @ q u a d r u s c o r p . c o m

***PLEASE REMOVE THE "-NOSPAM" PART OF MY RETURN ADDRESS***

Visit my web site at:  http://www.mcondic.com/

"Because that's where they keep the money."
    --  Willie Sutton when asked why he robbed banks. 
=============================================================