From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Pragma Inline and its Effects of Compilation Dependencies.
Date: 2000/03/22
Date: 2000-03-22T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38D90027.9975BDB9@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8b94tg$9jt$1@nnrp1.deja.com
> .... the only way to do full inlining with the classical
> library model is to delay inlining until binding, which is
> a very heavy burden, since it means delaying much or even all
> code generation till bind time.
I don't quite follow. If object code has been generated within
file xx.o for function XX.Func, what prevents a code generator,
when it reaches
Rec.Field := XX.Func (P, Q);
from streamlining the preamble and parameter setup and result
assignment, and copying the rest of the object code as is.
Or do you mean something else by "full" inlining?
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-22 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-20 0:00 Pragma Inline and its Effects of Compilation Dependencies Ralph Corderoy
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-03-23 0:00 ` Ralph Corderoy
2000-03-24 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-03-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Paul Graham
2000-03-21 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Ken Garlington
2000-03-23 0:00 ` Ralph Corderoy
2000-03-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-24 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
2000-03-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-23 0:00 ` Ralph Corderoy
2000-03-23 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox