comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Scott Ingram <scott@silver.jhuapl.edu>
Subject: Re: Alsys Ada question
Date: 2000/03/08
Date: 2000-03-08T15:20:24+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <38C66FB8.4F388B9E@silver.jhuapl.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8a4drv$mkg$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net

Richard D Riehle wrote:

> You are probably better off making the transition to an Ada 95 compiler.  It is
> upward compatible, in most respects, and will ultimately give you a better, more
> maintainable software application.  Whatever you do, don't fall into the trap of
> trying to convert the application to C++.  That is an "out of the frying pan and
> into the fire" solution.
> 
> Richard Riehle

No danger of going the C++ route.  I only learned C because I couldn't
find an
affordable Unix Ada compiler when I switched to Unix for home use ten
years ago :)
And the only maintenance necessary for this embedded system is to
determine the
origin of an unhandled exception.  It may in fact be a hardware fault
not accounted
for in the code, so with luck I may not have to rebuild the sources.
-- 
Scott Ingram
Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory




  reply	other threads:[~2000-03-08  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2000-03-07  0:00 Alsys Ada question Scott Ingram
2000-03-07  0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-07  0:00   ` Scott Ingram
2000-03-08  0:00 ` Ed Falis
2000-03-08  0:00   ` Scott Ingram
2000-03-08  0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-03-08  0:00   ` Scott Ingram [this message]
2000-03-08  0:00   ` Paul Warren
2000-03-09  0:00 ` Tony Matthews
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox