From: Scott Ingram <scott@silver.jhuapl.edu>
Subject: Re: Alsys Ada question
Date: 2000/03/08
Date: 2000-03-08T15:20:24+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38C66FB8.4F388B9E@silver.jhuapl.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 8a4drv$mkg$1@slb7.atl.mindspring.net
Richard D Riehle wrote:
> You are probably better off making the transition to an Ada 95 compiler. It is
> upward compatible, in most respects, and will ultimately give you a better, more
> maintainable software application. Whatever you do, don't fall into the trap of
> trying to convert the application to C++. That is an "out of the frying pan and
> into the fire" solution.
>
> Richard Riehle
No danger of going the C++ route. I only learned C because I couldn't
find an
affordable Unix Ada compiler when I switched to Unix for home use ten
years ago :)
And the only maintenance necessary for this embedded system is to
determine the
origin of an unhandled exception. It may in fact be a hardware fault
not accounted
for in the code, so with luck I may not have to rebuild the sources.
--
Scott Ingram
Sonar Processing and Analysis Laboratory
Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-03-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-03-07 0:00 Alsys Ada question Scott Ingram
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Scott Ingram
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Ed Falis
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Scott Ingram
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Scott Ingram [this message]
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Paul Warren
2000-03-09 0:00 ` Tony Matthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox