Re: 'with'ing and 'use'ing

[Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>]

> [Ada.Strings.Unbounded.Unbounded_String is] actually exhibit A 
> for the kind of thing I'm complaining about. How
> do the authors of that package know that I have a system where its
> appropriate to perform "use"s? 

Or why do they assume you don't work in a shop that 
labels "use" a mortal sin?

These shops exist, and though I disagree with their
attitude, I think it was inappropriate for the 9X designers
to force them to choose between their religion 
and readability.

(Or to force employees of such a shop to choose between
the boss's rules and readability.)

Revision suggestion (yes, I know this is the wrong address): 
We're stuck with these redundant names, since some are already 
in use.  But next revision, packages like unbounded could, via
'renames,' provide alternate names that won't look stupid 
in an anti-use shop.