From: Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch>
Subject: Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects'
Date: 2000/02/17
Date: 2000-02-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38AC4740.BD43D0E4@maths.unine.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 88h6ii$9em$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Florian:
> > 63,000 `potential known defects' (whatever this means) isn't too bad
> > for a software product consisting of over 30 million lines of code, is
> > it?
Maybe you are true. But I doubt that the power of a bug -whatever it is-
is diluted by the number of lines. A fatal bug won't crash the system softer
if you add 30 million other lines...
Ted:
> Personally I agrree with that. However, ZDNet has an interesting article
> disagreeing at
> http://www.zdnet.com/zdhubs/stories/special2000/0,9968,2439261,00.html .
> I'm not sure I agree with that author's implication that its possible to
> write large sotware that is bug-free. But he goes into the economic cost
> of all those bugs, and the fact that most of the bugs were in a very few
> of the modules. Its one of the best unintentional bits of Ada advocacy
> I've ever seen.
It is quite reassuring that one finds "57 percent of the software errors in
only 7 percent of the studied modules" (the article). But it doesn't tell how
the 43 other % are distributed... (see my little probabilistic simulation
in another sub-thread). According to the stability of past Windows releases
"the good one" will be out in 2001 or 2002...
--
Gautier
_____\\________________\_______\
http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-02-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 42+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-15 0:00 Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Gautier
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Ed Falis
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
[not found] ` <RUkq4.1243$dw3.69085@news.wenet.net>
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Dang! (was Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects') Mike Silva
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Win2000 has 63,000 'defects' Brian Rogoff
[not found] ` <150220001931201946%emery@grebyn.com>
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
[not found] ` <1e66z6d.1a9fzdvtbw6t2N%herwin@gmu.edu>
2000-02-19 0:00 ` Nick Roberts
2000-02-19 0:00 ` Joe Wisniewski
2000-02-21 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
2000-03-04 0:00 ` Robert I. Eachus
2000-03-06 0:00 ` Charles Hixson
2000-03-06 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Preben Randhol
2000-02-16 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Charles Hixson
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Mike Dimmick
2000-03-07 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Dale Pontius
2000-03-08 0:00 ` David Starner
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-03-08 0:00 ` Laurent Guerby
2000-03-10 0:00 ` Tarjei T. Jensen
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Florian Weimer
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Marin D. Condic
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
[not found] ` <38A9C619.790950B0@quadruscorp.com>
2000-02-15 0:00 ` Keith Thompson
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-02-17 0:00 ` Gautier [this message]
[not found] ` <38A9C4ED.C75316F9@raytheon.com>
2000-02-16 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
2000-02-16 0:00 ` Windows TP (Re: Win2000 has 63,000 'defects') Vladimir Olensky
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox