From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Philosophical Question (End_Of_File)
Date: 2000/02/11
Date: 2000-02-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38A4799B.6D2E7ABE@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> (raw)
We're taught to embed file input statements inside a control structure
with an End_Of_File test, right?
The idea is that instead of reading and then handling the exception, we
avoid the exception, right?
So why do some vendors implement End_Of_File something like this?
function End_Of_File (....) is
begin
Read_Without_Advancing;
return False;
exception
when End_Of_File => return True;
end End_Of_File;
I know of at least three that do this. It can't be easier--somewhere
down in the lower level, the end of file had to be detected and the
exception raised.
Am I missing something?
--
Wes Groleau
http://freepages.genealogy.rootsweb.com/~wgroleau
next reply other threads:[~2000-02-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-02-11 0:00 Wes Groleau [this message]
2000-02-11 0:00 ` Philosophical Question (End_Of_File) Gautier
2000-02-12 0:00 ` Gautier
2000-02-12 0:00 ` Pascal Martin
2000-02-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
2000-03-14 0:00 ` CFP OOPSLA 2000 Sherman Alpert
2000-02-14 0:00 ` Philosophical Question (End_Of_File) John English
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox