From: news@fedfil.UUCP (news)
Subject: Re: ada software reuse
Date: 24 Mar 93 21:53:56 GMT
Date: 1993-03-24T21:53:56+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <388@fedfil.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1993Mar18.154215.27544@unix.brighton.ac.uk*<1993Mar22.133141.9851@grebyn.com
In article <1993Mar22.133141.9851@grebyn.com>, karl@grebyn.com (Karl A. Nyberg) writes:
*I know real reuse is hard. Harder than I want to invest in at the moment.
Ada reuse? Wouldn't that be kind of like reusing toilet paper? Why
would you want to do that?? Shouldn't each individual Ada scandal be
unique???
--
Ted Holden
HTE
next parent reply other threads:[~1993-03-24 21:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <1993Mar18.154215.27544@unix.brighton.ac.uk*<1993Mar22.133141.9851@grebyn.com>
1993-03-24 21:53 ` news [this message]
1993-03-22 16:23 ada software reuse crispen
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1993-03-18 15:42 Terminal Boredom
1993-03-19 15:38 ` Gregory Aharonian
1993-03-22 13:31 ` Karl A. Nyberg
1993-03-24 6:51 ` Richard A. O'Keefe
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox