From: Alfred Hilscher <Alfred.Hilscher@icn.siemens.de>
Subject: Re: packet type ?
Date: 2000/01/18
Date: 2000-01-18T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38845EBD.6F90845D@icn.siemens.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 85njs1$3rl$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Ted Dennison wrote:
>
> > question is obsolete. What I'm looking for is something like a
> "packege
> > type" (similar to "task type"). What I want do is something like this:
>
> > Any suggestions how to do this ?
>
> That's what generics with package formal parameters are for.
I think thats not quite the same. Taking the example below, how would
you do this with generics ?
package type stack is
push (item : in ...);
pop (item : out ...)
end stack
procedure application is
User_stack : stack;
Supervisor_stack : stack;
Interrupt_stack : stack;
Any_Stack : access Stack;
begin
...
Any_Stack := new Stack; -- how do this ???
...
end application;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2000-01-18 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2000-01-14 0:00 packet type ? Alfred Hilscher
2000-01-14 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-01-18 0:00 ` Alfred Hilscher [this message]
2000-01-18 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-01-18 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
2000-01-19 0:00 ` Anders Gidenstam
2000-01-19 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
2000-01-20 0:00 ` Andy S
2000-01-20 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
2000-01-20 0:00 ` Brian Rogoff
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox