From: shapiro@rb-dc1.UUCP (Mike Shapiro)
Subject: Re: Design
Date: 6 Mar 89 17:40:40 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <385@rb-dc1.UUCP> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 890302220159.62f@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV
In article <890302220159.62f@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV> larry@VLSI.JPL.NASA.GOV writes:
<<< much deleted >>>
>handled well with CoBOL. The problems came when CoBOL (or ForTran, or
===== ===== =======
Please learn the proper spellings: COBOL and FORTRAN for the current standards.
===== =======
If you're referring to the next standard, it's Fortran.
=======
(See Foreward to X3J3 draft for document X3.9-198x.)
--
Michael Shapiro, Gould/General Systems Division
15378 Avenue of Science, San Diego, CA 92128
(619)485-0910 UUCP: ...sdcsvax!ncr-sd!rb-dc1!shapiro
prev parent reply other threads:[~1989-03-06 17:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1989-03-03 6:01 Design larry
1989-03-03 19:22 ` Design Bob Hathaway
1989-03-06 17:40 ` Mike Shapiro [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox