From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Questions about Unchecked_Conversion
Date: 1999/12/16
Date: 1999-12-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38593212_2@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1e2w3op.j44mmjevrxz4N%claveman@inetworld.net
In article <1e2w3op.j44mmjevrxz4N%claveman@inetworld.net> ,
claveman@inetworld.net (Charles H. Sampson) wrote:
> Notice also that this is highly hardware dependent. Use with care.
> However, don't avoid it because of this dependency when you really need
> it.
No, UC is not "highly hardware dependent." The semantics of UC are
well-defined, and the conditions under which these semantics are
guaranteed are listed in RM95 13.9 (5-11).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-15 0:00 Questions about Unchecked_Conversion MaryAnn Atkinson
1999-12-15 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-15 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-16 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
1999-12-16 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-12-17 0:00 ` reason67
1999-12-18 0:00 ` Charles H. Sampson
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox