comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Geoff Bull <gbull@acenet.com.au>
Subject: Re: The revolution will not be standardized
Date: 1999/12/15
Date: 1999-12-15T00:00:00+00:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <385779CB.12991F19@acenet.com.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 835mbb$5jd$1@nnrp1.deja.com



Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> In article <38561D9A.70B61403@acenet.com.au>,

> > There is a language specification for the core language.
> 
> But if Sun decides tomorrow that Java now looks just like Python, who's
> to stop them?

A few million unhappy customers.

> If someone makes a completely non-conformant JVM, and pays Sun a ton of
> money, what's to stop Sun from declaring it a valid JVM?

That would seem like a pretty dumb thing to do in the long term,
particularly considering the Sun v Microsoft cases.

> If someone makes a perfectly conformant Java but Sun doesn't like them
> for some other reason, what's to stop Sun from refusing to declare it a
> valid Java implementation?

I'm not a lawyer, but I can think of a few legal angles on this one.
To start with, in Australia, that would be a breach of our
Trade Practices Act. And I am under the impression that US laws are
tougher than ours in this regard.

> > The libraries are extensively documented, so that can be considered
> > a standard. And of course, the JVM has a standard.
> 
> Being documented does not make something a standard. By that logic,
> every commercial API in the world would be a "standard".

True - but if something has a few million users it is a defacto
standard.

> 
> "When is a standard *not* a standard?".

When nobody uses it.




  reply	other threads:[~1999-12-15  0:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 40+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1999-12-09  0:00 The revolution will not be standardized Ted Dennison
1999-12-10  0:00 ` Ed Falis
1999-12-10  0:00   ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-12  0:00   ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-12  0:00     ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-13  0:00       ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-13  0:00         ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-12-14  0:00           ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-13  0:00     ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-13  0:00       ` reason67
1999-12-13  0:00         ` Aidan Skinner
1999-12-14  0:00           ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-14  0:00             ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-14  0:00               ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-14  0:00                 ` Greg Martin
1999-12-14  0:00                   ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-15  0:00                     ` Greg Martin
1999-12-15  0:00                     ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-16  0:00                       ` Marin D. Condic
1999-12-21  0:00                       ` Geoff Bull
1999-12-21  0:00                         ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-21  0:00                           ` Richard D Riehle
1999-12-22  0:00                             ` Robert A Duff
1999-12-23  0:00                               ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23  0:00                                 ` Richard D Riehle
2000-01-05  0:00                                   ` Robert A Duff
2000-01-06  0:00                                     ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-06  0:00                                     ` Robert Dewar
2000-01-06  0:00                                       ` Robert A Duff
2000-01-06  0:00                                       ` Robert A Duff
2000-01-07  0:00                                         ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-23  0:00                                 ` Ehud Lamm
1999-12-23  0:00                                   ` gnat 3.12 Michael Ben-Gershon
1999-12-23  0:00                                     ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-15  0:00                   ` The revolution will not be standardized Ted Dennison
1999-12-14  0:00             ` Ted Dennison
1999-12-15  0:00               ` Geoff Bull [this message]
1999-12-15  0:00                 ` Preben Randhol
1999-12-14  0:00             ` reason67
1999-12-14  0:00       ` Geoff Bull
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox