From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: array size
Date: 1999/12/12
Date: 1999-12-12T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38532e6d_2@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com
In article <38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com> , "DuckE"
<nospam_steved@pacifier.com> wrote:
> BTW: When I tested your code on NT I was guessing that I would need some
> sort of component_size representation clause in the array declaration (as
> has been described in the 3 bit array thread). I was actually suprised at
> my result.
In general, if you want to completely specify the representation of the
type, you should specify everything, including the Component_Size.
Use pragma Pack when you want to optimize for space, and when you don't
care about exact representation.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-10 0:00 array size James E. Hopper
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-13 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-11 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-12-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-12-12 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox