From: "DuckE" <nospam_steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: array size
Date: 1999/12/11
Date: 1999-12-11T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38532c6a.0@news.pacifier.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 111219991626405236%hopperj@macconnect.com
BTW: When I tested your code on NT I was guessing that I would need some
sort of component_size representation clause in the array declaration (as
has been described in the 3 bit array thread). I was actually suprised at
my result.
SteveD
James E. Hopper <hopperj@macconnect.com> wrote in message
news:111219991626405236%hopperj@macconnect.com...
> Steve,
> that pretty much answers my question about it being a bug in machten.
> the problem arose initially on solaris (it was sent to me as a
> question) and the machten port gives the same answer as the solaris
> port. but if NT gives the expected answer then there is possibly
> something wrong with gnat??? I will send it on to ACT
>
> THANKS! jim
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-12-11 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-12-10 0:00 array size James E. Hopper
1999-12-10 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-11 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-13 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-11 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-12-11 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
1999-12-11 0:00 ` DuckE [this message]
1999-12-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-12-12 0:00 ` James E. Hopper
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox