From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Pageless Text_IO
Date: 1999/11/24
Date: 1999-11-24T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <383C604F.54773629@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 812oph$256$1@nnrp1.deja.com
> > Doesn't the language leave the meaning of form parameters
> > entirely up to the implementation? Put it in GNAT and let
> > the users say whether they agree. :-)
>
> Well why don't you put it in GNAT? That's why we have open
> sources, right? :-)
Not very many users will want to download my version of GNAT.
But if ACT puts it in, since the form parameter is optional,
its availability won't hurt those who decide not to use it!
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-24 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-16 0:00 Pageless Text_IO David Starner
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Arthur Evans Jr
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` John Herro
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-11-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-24 0:00 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
1999-11-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox