From: Wes Groleau <wwgrol@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com>
Subject: Re: Pageless Text_IO
Date: 1999/11/17
Date: 1999-11-17T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3832C9A0.C05FAE51@ftw.rsc.raytheon.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 80s63a$afp$1@nnrp1.deja.com
> A form parameter PAGE_BREAKS => NO would be a handy
> addition to Text_IO, it would say simply that on input
> new page characters were not treated specially in any
> way, just treated as characters if encountered, and
> on output, New_Page generates such a character but has
> no other effect.
>
> Needs a bit more detailed woring out, but sounds quite
> practical.
Doesn't the language leave the meaning of form parameters
entirely up to the implementation? Put it in GNAT and let
the users say whether they agree. :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-17 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-16 0:00 Pageless Text_IO David Starner
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` John Herro
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Wes Groleau [this message]
1999-11-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-24 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-11-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` David Starner
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` Arthur Evans Jr
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-11-16 0:00 ` DuckE
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Wes Groleau
1999-11-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox