From: Dale Stanbrough <dale@goanna.cs.rmit.edu.au>
Subject: Re: Hard data on C/C++ -vs- Ada
Date: 18 Oct 1994 22:55:33 GMT
Date: 1994-10-18T22:55:33+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <381jp5$580@goanna.cs.rmit.oz.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1994Oct17.165611.1@delphi.dasd.honeywell.com
Subject: Hard data on C/C++ -vs- Ada
From: TOM, tsorense@delphi.dasd.honeywell.com
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 1994 23:56:11 GMT
In article <1994Oct17.165611.1@delphi.dasd.honeywell.com> TOM,
tsorense@delphi.dasd.honeywell.com writes:
>Does anybody have some hard C or C++ -vs- Ada programming data? Something
>like:
>
> Develop a system in Ada or C given the same system specification:
>
> Then keep the following data:
>
> How long did it take to design (preliminary and detailed)?
> How long did it take to Code?
> How many reviews were done? (design/code)
> How long did it take to unit test?
> How long did it take to integration test?
> How long did it take to formal qualification test?
>
> I would really like to do some comparisons if I can, if not maybe I'll
> do my own experiment and see what the results are. (I'd really prefer
> someone else's data)
Perhaps it would also be appropriate to include...
Develop a change in spec, give the code to a new group, get them
to implement the change, and test all of these all over again.
I fear your tests are only examining one part of the life cycle.
Dale
-------------------------------------------------------------
Dale Stanbrough, RMIT, Melbourne, Australia, dale@rmit.edu.au
GNU Ada 94 (GNAT) => the best $0 you'll ever spend.
Available for DOS, Linux, OS/2, Sun Sparc, Sun Solaris, ...
Coming to a GNU supported platform near you soon...
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-18 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-10-17 23:56 Hard data on C/C++ -vs- Ada TOM
1994-10-18 22:55 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox