Re: Question about SPARK flow error.

[Phil Thornley <phil.jpthornley@gmail.com>]

On 19 June, 19:23, "Gavino" <inva...@invalid.invalid> wrote:
> "Phil Thornley" <phil.jpthorn...@gmail.com> wrote in message
>
> news:fd3e54b4-bff0-470a-8409-f48c3289a2f3@x27g2000yqb.googlegroups.com...
>
> > One way to get rid of the error is to introduce a 'Local_Index' that
> > is set in the loop; then set Index to that value after the loop if
> > Found is True (and your existing code if False).
>
> Doesn't that just push the flow error onto Local_Index?
> After all, the loop body itself may (in principle) never be executed.

Ummm, yes, you're probably right :-(

(Just shows that I should have stuck to my normal policy of not
pronouncing on what the Examiner will do without checking it first on
real code).

Cheers,

Phil