From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: ARM questions
Date: 1999/11/01
Date: 1999-11-01T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <381dfb60_1@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 381DF32B.72F58E8A@mbox5.singnet.com.sg
In article <381DF32B.72F58E8A@mbox5.singnet.com.sg> , Siow Wey Hua
<ps750@mbox5.singnet.com.sg> wrote:
> Is there any difference between the AARM (which is available at the PAL)
> and the ARM listed below ? I am thinking of buying a copy myself. And is
> the ARM absolutely accurate in content ?
The acronym "AARM" stands for "Annotated Ada Reference Manual," and yes,
it is different from the manual you cite below. The difference is that
it contains extra information (the annotations) about why the language
designers made the choices they did.
The AARM is really for compiler writers and power users.
> Ada 95 Reference Manual : Language and Standard Libraries :
> International Standard Iso/Iec 8652:1995(E) (Lecture Notes in Computer
> Science, 1246) by S. Tucker Taft (Editor), Robert A. Duff (Editor), T.
> Taft (Editor)
--
The theory of evolution is quite rightly called the greatest unifying
theory in biology. The diversity of organisms, similarities and
differences between kinds of organisms, patterns of distribution and
behavior, adaptation and interaction, all this was merely a bewildering
chaos of facts until given meaning by the evolutionary theory.
Populations, Species, and Evolution
Ernst Mayr
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-11-01 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-11-02 0:00 ARM questions Siow Wey Hua
1999-11-01 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-11-02 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox