From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete?
Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 22:23:49 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-06-30T22:23:49-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3817715b-2a7e-438d-8b14-a3f779d0a77e@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d7564f4d-4fc2-4666-bd1e-f3936f477217@googlegroups.com>
There is this sentence at the very beginning of Annex P:
"This Annex summarizes the complete syntax of the language. See 1.1.4 for a description of the notation used."
And RM 1.1.4(14) says: "If the name of any syntactic category starts with an italicized part, it is equivalent to the category name without the italicized part. The italicized part is intended to convey some semantic information. For example *subtype*_name and *task*_name are both equivalent to name alone."
My invention to use * as an indication of italics that I can't use here.
HTH
prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-07-01 5:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-06-30 18:25 Ada 2012 BNF syntax summary incomplete? Ingo Marks
2012-06-30 19:53 ` Niklas Holsti
2012-07-01 5:06 ` anon
2012-07-01 5:23 ` AdaMagica [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox