From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Generic abstract procedures
Date: 1999/10/14
Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38068800_1@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net
In article <380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net> , "Matthew Heaney"
<matthew_heaney@acm.org> wrote:
> In article <slrn80cetb.mmj.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de> , lutz@iks-jena.de
> (Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote:
>
>
>> I'm going to implement a Iterator pattern.
> [snip]
>> My question is: Does anybody already solved such a problem in an elegant way?
>
> See my article "Iterator and Factory Method Patterns Combined," in the
> Nov 1998 design patterns archive, for some ideas.
Oops! I forgot to provide a URL:
<http://www.acm.org/archives/patterns.html>
Matt
--
Evolution is as well documented as any phenomenon in science, as
strongly as the earth's revolution around the sun rather than vice
versa.
Stephen Jay Gould, Time, 23 Aug 1999
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-14 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-14 0:00 Generic abstract procedures Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-10-15 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox