From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Generic abstract procedures
Date: 1999/10/14
Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <380685f5_4@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn80cetb.mmj.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de
In article <slrn80cetb.mmj.lutz@belenus.iks-jena.de> , lutz@iks-jena.de
(Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote:
> I'm going to implement a Iterator pattern.
[snip]
> My question is: Does anybody already solved such a problem in an elegant way?
See my article "Iterator and Factory Method Patterns Combined," in the
Nov 1998 design patterns archive, for some ideas.
Matt
--
Why stop at evolution and cosmology, though? Let's make sure that the
schoolkids of Kansas get a really first-rate education by loosening up
the teaching standards for other so-called scientific ideas that are,
after all, just theories. The atomic theory, for example. The theory of
relativity. Heck, the Copernican theory--do we really know that the
universe doesn't revolve around the earth?
John Rennie, Scientific American, Oct 1999
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-14 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-14 0:00 Generic abstract procedures Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-15 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox