From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Generic abstract procedures
Date: 1999/10/14
Date: 1999-10-14T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <38062215_1@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: slrn80biot.19p.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de
In article <slrn80biot.19p.lutz@taranis.iks-jena.de> , lutz@iks-jena.de
(Lutz Donnerhacke) wrote:
> Does anybody knows a solution other than derivating the actual collection
> from an abstract tagged type? Obviously I failed with a dumb generic attempt.
What exactly are you trying to do? It is certainly not obvious from
your post.
You must state your specific needs explicitly and unambigously, in order
for CLA readers to help you.
Matt
--
Science is, foremost, a method of interrogating reality: proposing
hypotheses that seem true and then testing them -- trying, almost
perversely, to negate them, elevating only the handful that survive to
the status of a theory. Creationism is a doctrine, whose adherents are
interested only in seeking out data that support it.
George Johnson, NY Times, 15 Aug 1999
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-10-14 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-10-14 0:00 Generic abstract procedures Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-14 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-10-15 0:00 ` Lutz Donnerhacke
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox