From: wfan1@lindblat.cc.monash.edu.au (William Fang)
Subject: Re: Newbie Generic Reg Exp Pattern Matching Question
Date: 11 Oct 1994 16:10:59 GMT
Date: 1994-10-11T16:10:59+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37edej$i90@harbinger.cc.monash.edu.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Cx6H7F.JC2@inmet.camb.inmet.com
Here's a message from my brother. His site seems to have missed *all* the
followups.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
--| Thanks for the pointers.
--| I have used the Goodenough "hack" to get the package going.
--| Is John Goodenough a real person, or just a made up name?
--| (ie Good Enough?)
--| I don't think I'll ever be a competent Ada language-lawyer
--| like Robert Eachus, Stef Van Vlierberghe or Tucker Taft.
--| If I was a gambling man, I'll have to place an each way bet on
--| the proper interpretation, as the code by Booch suggests he
--| came to the same conclusion as Robert (assuming that Grady Booch
--| did compile his code ;) But the Meridian compiler seems to support
--| Tucker and Stef.
--| Jim
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
prev parent reply other threads:[~1994-10-11 16:10 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1994-10-03 14:54 Newbie Generic Reg Exp Pattern Matching Question Jimmy Fang
1994-10-04 11:29 ` Robert I. Eachus
1994-10-04 22:03 ` Stef Van Vlierberghe
1994-10-05 2:21 ` Tucker Taft
1994-10-11 16:10 ` William Fang [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox