From: "Matthew Heaney" <matthew_heaney@acm.org>
Subject: Re: Engineering types hierarchy
Date: 1999/09/08
Date: 1999-09-08T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37d6c9ab@news1.prserv.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: t73dwpckha.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com
In article <t73dwpckha.fsf@calumny.jyacc.com> , Hyman Rosen
<hymie@prolifics.com> wrote:
> Although this is an Ada group, I am moved to demonstrate a C++ solution
> which is applicable when all units are known at compile time. It's from
> Barton & Nackman's excellant "Scientific and Engineering C++", and is
> quite beautiful. Perhaps it can be transformed into Ada by someone who
> knows more about the language than I do.
This is indeed very similar to an approach that has already been written in
Ada. It appeared in Do While Jones' book, and was an IEEE standard (I
think) which was spear-headed by Bill Whitaker (I think).
I still prefer the approach I showed in another post, but YMMV.
Matt
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-08 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-08 0:00 Engineering types hierarchy David Kristola
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Hyman Rosen
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney [this message]
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-08 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-11 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-09-09 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
1999-09-10 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-09-09 0:00 Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-09 0:00 ` Pat Rogers
1999-09-10 0:00 ` David Kristola
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox