From: Zeiram <zeiram@deathsdoor.com>
Subject: Re: Help needed: Access type to functions in generic package
Date: 1999/09/12
Date: 1999-09-12T19:28:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37DBFEBF.B74D1958@deathsdoor.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37dbe7da@news1.prserv.net
Matthew Heaney wrote :
> Why is this package generic? Why don't you declare your array type this
> way:
>
In fact, this was just a part of the definitions of my package.
In reality, my type T_Maze is declared as private. This is due
to the fact that I also need to realize a dynamic implementation
of my software (yes, this a project from my CS course :-) )
It consequently seemed logical to create this package as a
generic one.
If I decide to use a non private type and do only a static
implementation, I know for sure your solution will work
perfect. (It was, in fact, the way I ran my first tests)
Thanks for your help.
Has anybody other ideas?
Regards,
Zeiram
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-09-12 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-09-12 0:00 Help needed: Access type to functions in generic package Zeiram
1999-09-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-12 0:00 ` Zeiram [this message]
1999-09-12 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-09-13 0:00 ` zeiram
1999-09-13 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox