From: William Starner <billeug@worldnet.att.net>
Subject: Packages and Subpackages - style question
Date: 1999/07/25
Date: 1999-07-26T03:01:18+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <379BCF2B.D75859BC@worldnet.att.net> (raw)
I'm writing a library that has some high level routines that interface to some
lower level routines. These lower level routines can be used directly, just with
more care, and more worry about changing versions.
Is it more appropriate to name the lower level packages nla23.internal_blah or
nla23.internal.blah? That is, should an empty package nla23.internal be made
soley to hold the internal structures?
next reply other threads:[~1999-07-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-25 0:00 William Starner [this message]
1999-07-27 0:00 ` Packages and Subpackages - style question Stephen Leake
1999-07-29 0:00 ` Jeff Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox