Re: Package with initialization only

["Samuel T. Harris" <sam_harris@hso.link.com>]

Ted Dennison wrote:
> 
> In article <37961DD6.E56BD3E9@maths.unine.ch>,
>   Gautier <gautier.demontmollin@maths.unine.ch> wrote:
> > A small "aesthetic" problem: I have a package with initialization
> only;
> > thus I must add a dummy procedure to resolve the with/without body
> > ambiguity Ada95 doesn't accept. There is surely a more elegant
> formulation,
> 
> Well, perhaps it would be more pleasing if you renamed your dummy
> routine "Initialize" and moved all the initialization code into it. If
> you put it into the public part that would even allow others to
> reinitialize the variable.
> 

While I don't disagree with Ted's suggestion,
I do want to point out that many times the
"intialization" must be done only once, preferably
during elaboration. In such cases, I call the
procedure "elaborate" and call it in the package body.
I feel the name elaborate conveys the restriction
of single initialization

In my experience, a common need for an elaborate
procedure is a variable which is an array of access
to strings. The strings may change over time and I
don't want the entire package body recompiling because
of such changes. By using an "initialize" or "elaborate"
procedure, I can make it a separate unit thus
isolating the compilation impact. 

-- 
Samuel T. Harris, Principal Engineer
Raytheon, Scientific and Technical Systems
"If you can make it, We can fake it!"