From: Gautier <Gautier.deMontmollin@Maths.UniNe.CH>
To: Steve Doiel <steved@pacifier.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT -vs- ObjectAda (was Re: where is the faq)
Date: 1999/07/19
Date: 1999-07-19T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37934616.F82715F2@Maths.UniNe.CH> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3790b774.0@news.pacifier.com
> We have compiled and ran our code under both ObjectAda and GNAT.
> The code compiled under GNAT tends to run approximately 2X the
> speed.
Same rate experienced when choosing a new compiler for a commercial
program (~100'000 LOC). What is surprising is that the old Alsys
compiler seemed to produce compact and fast code... maybe not
fit for present bloatware demand...
--
Gautier
--------
http://members.xoom.com/gdemont/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-07-19 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-07-14 0:00 where is the faq Rick Sutcliffe
1999-07-14 0:00 ` David Botton
1999-07-15 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-16 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-16 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-07-16 0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
1999-07-17 0:00 ` GNAT -vs- ObjectAda (was Re: where is the faq) Steve Doiel
1999-07-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-26 0:00 ` Pascal F. Martin
1999-07-26 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-29 0:00 ` Pascal F. Martin
1999-07-30 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-08-03 0:00 ` Pascal F. Martin
1999-08-03 0:00 ` jerry
1999-08-04 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-08-04 0:00 ` Samuel T. Harris
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Gautier [this message]
1999-07-19 0:00 ` Ted Dennison
1999-07-17 0:00 ` where is the faq Robert Dewar
1999-07-17 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-07-25 0:00 ` tmoran
1999-07-16 0:00 ` David Kristola
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox