From: g_harrison@vger.nsu.edu
Subject: Re: Legislative Mandate for Ada
Date: 14 Dec 90 02:59:35 GMT [thread overview]
Message-ID: <378.276807d8@vger.nsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2449@sparko.gwu.edu
In article <2449@sparko.gwu.edu>, mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman)
writes:
[some of Mike's stuff deleted]
> In this case, congress passed this DoD appropriation bill at the end
> of October, and Bush signed it. Here is the relevant paragraph:
>
> As background, here is a lengthy paragraph from the explanatory language
> that came along with the conference report.
>
> "Ada Programming Language - The Department of Defense developed Ada to
...... loop put("bla blah"); end loop;
This seems to be pure psyco-babble. It sounds like a memo from a Dean (My dean
doesn't read this [I PRAY]!). The statement sould say "Use it [Ada] or loose
it [Contract]."
"Cost Effective" is a wonderful generalization to mean almost anything
including "My FORTRAN programmers will claim permanent disability and expect
workman's comp." or "Ada is TOO BIG for my machine. [read "Ada is too complex
for my programmers."]. If I get flamed, then so be it! I just feel that
realizing that one [relatively] portable language with some nice features that
conform to some good software engineering practices is worthy of a mandate with
appropriate considerations to current hardware and requirements constraints.
Any good programmer can learn to use Ada in the way it was designed.
>
> This is what is known as "legislative history." It is not formally
> part of the law but gives insight into the mindset of the lawmakers
> (or their staff people, really). Have fun with it.
>
> Mike Feldman
I did have fun with it, Mike. Thanks.
------------------------------------------------------*------o Happy---
-- George C. Harrison ------------------------------ * * ----o_o___ New---
----- Professor of Computer Science -------------- * * * ----\ o /-Year--
----- Norfolk State University, ----------------- *Merry* ----\ /--------
-------- Norfolk, Virginia 23504 --------------- * * * * * ----|---------
----- INTERNET: g_harrison@vger.nsu.edu ------ *Christmas* --_|_--------
----------These are MY views.... you may share them..*** -----------------
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1990-12-14 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1990-12-13 19:10 Legislative Mandate for Ada Michael Feldman
1990-12-13 22:12 ` Charles H. Sampson
1990-12-14 4:47 ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-14 2:59 ` g_harrison [this message]
1990-12-14 16:56 ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-14 17:00 ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-15 17:02 ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-17 18:26 ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-17 20:39 ` David Emery
1990-12-18 11:15 ` g_harrison
1990-12-18 14:10 ` RICK CARLE
1990-12-18 15:21 ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-18 22:46 ` compilers for Ada; " Paul Stachour
1990-12-20 1:59 ` Dick Dunn
1990-12-20 19:11 ` Ada survival without daddy Lord Byron (was leg. mandate) g_harrison
1990-12-21 19:15 ` Ada in Industry: Merit not Mandate Richard Pattis
1990-12-26 17:45 ` James THIELE
1990-12-17 20:57 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada Michael Feldman
1990-12-17 20:42 ` Charles H. Sampson
1990-12-17 22:13 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada; mindless translations Michael Feldman
1990-12-18 10:59 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada g_harrison
1990-12-18 17:41 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada; mindless translations Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
1990-12-14 20:59 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
1990-12-15 17:50 ` Pat Rogers
1990-12-18 17:37 ` Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1990-12-15 17:22 Michael Feldman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox