comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: g_harrison@vger.nsu.edu
Subject: Re: Legislative Mandate for Ada
Date: 14 Dec 90 02:59:35 GMT	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <378.276807d8@vger.nsu.edu> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 2449@sparko.gwu.edu

In article <2449@sparko.gwu.edu>, mfeldman@seas.gwu.edu (Michael Feldman) 
writes:

[some of Mike's stuff deleted]

> In this case, congress passed this DoD appropriation bill at the end
> of October, and Bush signed it. Here is the relevant paragraph:
> 

> As background, here is a lengthy paragraph from the explanatory language
> that came along with the conference report.
> 
> "Ada Programming Language - The Department of Defense developed Ada to
...... loop put("bla blah"); end loop;

This seems to be pure psyco-babble.  It sounds like a memo from a Dean (My dean
doesn't read this [I PRAY]!).  The statement sould say "Use it [Ada] or loose 
it [Contract]."

"Cost Effective" is a wonderful generalization to mean almost anything
including "My FORTRAN programmers will claim permanent disability and expect
workman's comp."  or "Ada is TOO BIG for my machine. [read "Ada is too complex
for my programmers."].  If I get flamed, then so be it!  I just feel that
realizing that one [relatively] portable language with some nice features that
conform to some good software engineering practices is worthy of a mandate with
appropriate considerations to current hardware and requirements constraints. 


Any good programmer can learn to use Ada in the way it was designed.  

> 
> This is what is known as "legislative history." It is not formally
> part of the law but gives insight into the mindset of the lawmakers
> (or their staff people, really). Have fun with it.
> 
> Mike Feldman

I did have fun with it, Mike.  Thanks.  

------------------------------------------------------*------o    Happy---
-- George C. Harrison ------------------------------ * * ----o_o___ New---
----- Professor of Computer Science --------------  * * * ----\ o /-Year--
----- Norfolk State University, -----------------  *Merry* ----\ /--------
-------- Norfolk, Virginia 23504 ---------------  * * * * * ----|---------
----- INTERNET:  g_harrison@vger.nsu.edu ------  *Christmas* --_|_--------
----------These are MY views.... you may share them..*** -----------------

  parent reply	other threads:[~1990-12-14  2:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
1990-12-13 19:10 Legislative Mandate for Ada Michael Feldman
1990-12-13 22:12 ` Charles H. Sampson
1990-12-14  4:47   ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-14  2:59 ` g_harrison [this message]
1990-12-14 16:56 ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-14 17:00   ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-15 17:02   ` Michael Feldman
1990-12-17 18:26     ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-17 20:39       ` David Emery
1990-12-18 11:15         ` g_harrison
1990-12-18 14:10         ` RICK CARLE
1990-12-18 15:21         ` Bruce Benson
1990-12-18 22:46           ` compilers for Ada; " Paul Stachour
1990-12-20  1:59         ` Dick Dunn
1990-12-20 19:11           ` Ada survival without daddy Lord Byron (was leg. mandate) g_harrison
1990-12-21 19:15             ` Ada in Industry: Merit not Mandate Richard Pattis
1990-12-26 17:45               ` James THIELE
1990-12-17 20:57       ` Legislative Mandate for Ada Michael Feldman
1990-12-17 20:42     ` Charles H. Sampson
1990-12-17 22:13       ` Legislative Mandate for Ada; mindless translations Michael Feldman
1990-12-18 10:59       ` Legislative Mandate for Ada g_harrison
1990-12-18 17:41       ` Legislative Mandate for Ada; mindless translations Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
1990-12-14 20:59 ` Legislative Mandate for Ada Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
1990-12-15 17:50   ` Pat Rogers
1990-12-18 17:37   ` Matthias Ulrich Neeracher
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1990-12-15 17:22 Michael Feldman
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox