From: Graeme Perkes <graeme.perkes@sydney.gecm.com>
Subject: Re: Creation of storage pools
Date: 1999/06/07
Date: 1999-06-07T01:02:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <375B1A89.53E3@sydney.gecm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: x7vemjri42j.fsf@pogner.moho
Simon Wright wrote:
>
> Writing this works:
>
> with Pools;
>
> procedure Use_Pools is
> P : Pools.User_Pool renames Pools.My_Pool.all;
> type Int_Acc is access Integer;
> for Int_Acc'Storage_Pool use P;
> begin
> null;
> end Use_Pools;
>
> Looks like time to submit a report (Graeme, I guess you _are_
> supported? since you're using 3.11b2?)
Thanks for the advice. I was able to apply the above "hack"
successfully.
Is "for X'Storage_Pool use MY_Pool.all" really a GNAT bug? The
wording in RM95 13.11(15) indicates that a variable _name_ is
required.
How do other compilers respond to the syntax I was trying to use?
Regards,
--
Graeme Perkes GEC Marconi Systems Pty Limited
mailto:graeme.perkes@gecms.com.au 40-52 Talavera Road, North Ryde
Tel: +61 2 9855 8961 NSW 2113 Australia
Fax: +61 2 9855 8884
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-06-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-26 0:00 Creation of storage pools Graeme Perkes
1999-06-04 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1999-06-04 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-06-05 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-06-07 0:00 ` Graeme Perkes [this message]
1999-06-07 0:00 ` adam
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox