From: Rod Chapman <rod@praxis-cs.co.uk>
Subject: Re: Is an RTOS Required for Ada?
Date: 1999/05/28
Date: 1999-05-28T16:47:15+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <374EC6EA.61519FAF@praxis-cs.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7ifapi$lf1$1@nnrp1.deja.com
Robert Dewar wrote:
>
> Right! Of course the line between generating code for the source
> you write, and "inserting code" is a very difficult, perhaps
> impossible line to draw.
My normal rule-of-thumb is "no surprises" - the compiler should
not ever surprise me in its generated code, or (perhaps
more simply put) generate code that I can't understand and
map back to the source, irrespective of optimization
level. I'm quite happy to accept simple inlined loops
for block assignment or comparison, since these seem perfectly
reasonable, whether as a result of inlining or not.
Just me penneth worth...
- Rod
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-05-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-13 0:00 Is an RTOS Required for Ada? Tramse
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Marin David Condic
1999-05-13 0:00 ` Rakesh Malhotra
1999-05-14 0:00 ` Tramse
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-19 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-25 0:00 ` George Romanski
1999-05-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-26 0:00 ` George Romanski
1999-05-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-06-09 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1999-06-09 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-28 0:00 ` Rod Chapman [this message]
1999-05-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-28 0:00 ` Richard D Riehle
1999-05-28 0:00 ` David C. Hoos, Sr.
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Tarjei Tj�stheim Jensen
1999-05-20 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1999-05-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-05-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox