From: Michael <lupinus@pipeline.com>
Subject: pragma Elaborate (Comp. Unit) question.
Date: 1999/05/21
Date: 1999-05-21T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <37458C65.3393@pipeline.com> (raw)
Hi All,
2 questions:
Should one ever *need* get an error message from a compiler that a
compilation unit needs to have a "pragma Elaborate" clause for another
unit?
That is, if the compiler knows what the elaboration order needs to be
why can't it make the relavant deterministic change and proceed with a
warning?
Is it because elaboratation is by definition non-deterministic and if
so why is it that way?
FYI, I am using Vads Ada83.
-- Michael
Take out the "no_" and the "_spam" to reply
next reply other threads:[~1999-05-21 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-05-21 0:00 Michael [this message]
1999-05-22 0:00 ` pragma Elaborate (Comp. Unit) question Thierry Lelegard
1999-05-22 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
1999-05-24 0:00 Robert I. Eachus
1999-05-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox