From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables
Date: 1999/04/16
Date: 1999-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3717b010.18059463@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 37179A21.82A1AF7@averstar.com
>permission
>to remove an Initialize/Finalize pair only if there is an assignment
Ah, so the complete removal of the (seemingly) unused control type
declaration is a consequence of being able to optimize the case where
it is in fact used (later)?
> Initialize(X);
> ...
> Finalize(X)
> <copy Y to X>
What happens if the Initialize or Finalize of X, (which will be
optimized away) modifies Y? Or is that illegal?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-11 0:00 Unreferenced lock variables Simon Wright
1999-04-11 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran [this message]
1999-04-19 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox