From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables
Date: 1999/04/16
Date: 1999-04-16T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3717869e.7448255@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7f6ei7$tvl$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
I found AI-00147, which as far as I can see gives no significant
arguments *for* eliminating in the non-limited case, except "doing
Initialization/Finalization is expensive". It seems to that either
the programmer intended the object to be declared, even though he
doesn't use it, or it was a mistake on his part and a warning should
be generated (as for unused Integer, Boolean, and other non-controlled
types). So possibly such a warning in the non-limited case would be
reasonable, but simply assuming the programmer did not really intend
to declare the controlled object, is hubris.
Or is there another AI that I missed?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-16 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-11 0:00 Unreferenced lock variables Simon Wright
1999-04-11 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran [this message]
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-19 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox