From: tmoran@bix.com (Tom Moran)
Subject: Re: Unreferenced lock variables
Date: 1999/04/13
Date: 1999-04-13T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <3713b417.22324981@news.pacbell.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 7esrmv$k1n$1@nnrp1.dejanews.com
>With regard to initialization and finalization, the ARG
>just agreed (unwisely if you ask me!) to allow a compiler
>to optimize away initialization and finalization for an
>otherwise unreferenced variable.
It seems such a bad idea - what arguments led them to this decision?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1999-04-13 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1999-04-11 0:00 Unreferenced lock variables Simon Wright
1999-04-11 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-14 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
1999-04-12 0:00 ` Simon Wright
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-13 0:00 ` Tom Moran [this message]
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-15 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-19 0:00 ` Tucker Taft
1999-04-16 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1999-04-20 0:00 ` Tom Moran
1999-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox